“I’m seeing things in my life now that I never would have seen if I hadn’t been married this long,” my friend said to me.
It was the kind of thing someone shares not over a brief coffee, but on a long hike, after trivial conversation has given way to something more. He had twice as many married years under his belt as I did. Immediately, he had my attention.
He went on to explain what he meant. But it wasn’t just about his marriage. It was about the life that had grown around it—the people they had helped, the family they had built, the changes they had lived through. He and his wife were not the same people anymore. In a sense, they were each married to people they could not have known at the beginning they would become.
On the other side of all that change, all those additions, and plenty of struggle was a richer kind of life that could not have been had any other way.
It cast a vision for marriage I rarely hear talked about: there are goods on the other side of faithfulness that cannot be seen from the beginning.
That conversation stayed with me. Because marriage is not the only place where we are asked to remain faithful before we can see everything that faithfulness may make possible.
Consider church.
GRASPING FOR “CHURCH”
Church is not a neutral word today. It can carry memories of belonging and beauty. It can also carry disappointment, boredom, hurt, obligation, politics, buildings, programs—or simply one more thing demanding space on an already crowded calendar.
That makes it easy to forget how strange the thing itself is.
Even the word church can hide some of that strangeness. The Greek word ekklesia was not invented by Christians. It could simply refer to an assembly—a gathering of people. What made this particular gathering remarkable was not the name they gave it, but what they believed God was doing among them.
And apparently one picture was not enough to describe it.
Scripture calls these people a body. A bride. A household. A flock. A temple. A family. The people of God. Paul even describes people who had once been separated from one another as a “new humanity.”
It is almost as though the New Testament keeps turning the object in its hands, looking at it from another angle: What exactly has God made here?
Which makes another feature of the New Testament interesting. For all the ways it describes the church, it rarely stops to give the kind of comprehensive answer we might expect to a very modern question: Why church?
WHY CHURCH?
Scripture does give us answers. Hebrews 10:24–25, for example, tells Christians not to neglect gathering, but to encourage one another and to consider how to stir one another toward love and good works. That tells us something important about what happens when Christians keep coming together.
But it does not read like a comprehensive answer to the question. Neither do the other passages that speak about the church. Instead, Scripture seems to assume this gathered people and then show us, from different angles, what God is doing in and through them.
Maybe that feels unsatisfying because we like reasons.
Reasons help us decide whether something is worth the cost. They help us explain our commitments to other people—and sometimes to ourselves. If we know what something is for, we know what to expect from it. We can tell whether it is working.
And that is where the question Why church? can quietly become another question:
What am I supposed to be getting out of this?
That is not always a selfish question. Sometimes it comes from disappointment. Sometimes exhaustion. Sometimes hurt. Sometimes from sitting through another Sunday wondering whether any of this is actually doing anything.
But there may be a problem with beginning there.
Some realities have to be received before they can be reduced to their usefulness. Some kinds of faithfulness ask us to enter before we can possibly know everything that will come from staying.
So perhaps before we ask why church, Scripture invites us to ask something more basic: What has God actually made?
WHAT GOD HAS MADE
Ephesians 2 gives one of the New Testament’s most astonishing answers.
Paul is writing to Gentile Christians—people who had once stood outside Israel’s covenant story. He describes them as strangers to the promises, without hope and “without God in the world.” But in Christ, those who were far away have been brought near.
And Paul keeps piling image on top of image. People who were divided have been made into “one new humanity.” Strangers have become citizens. Outsiders have become members of a household.
Then Paul takes the picture one step further: “In him you also are being built together into a dwelling place for God by the Spirit.”
A dwelling place for God.
That language would have carried enormous weight. For generations, God’s dwelling had been associated with sacred space—the tabernacle, the temple, the place where his name rested and his presence dwelled among his people.
But now Paul applies that language to people. Not merely to individuals. To people being built together. In other words, what had once been associated with sacred space is now being said of a sacred people.
It is almost as though God is saying: This is mine. I possess it in a special way. This is where I dwell.
And that matters because in Scripture, God’s dwelling is never an empty idea. Where God dwells, life is reordered around him. His presence carries holiness, peace, belonging, blessing, life. Not simply better circumstances. A different kind of life. A life fitted to the God who made it.
So perhaps the first answer to Why church? is not a benefit at all. Perhaps it begins with this: Because this is what God has made.
And only after receiving that reality do we begin to ask what life inside it might become.
WHY I GO TO CHURCH
If God has chosen to dwell among a people, we might be tempted to say, “That’s why I go to church—to experience God.”
There is something true in that. But it can also become slippery. What happens when the experience does not feel particularly spiritual? When the music does not move us, the sermon does not connect, the room feels awkward, or we leave feeling about the same as when we arrived? Was God absent? Did the gathering fail?
And what do we do with the person who says, “I experience God more deeply alone in the woods”? That may be a real experience of God. But it is not the same thing Paul is describing in Ephesians 2.
Paul’s claim is bigger than our ability to recognize or measure what is happening. God does not dwell among his people only when the gathering feels powerful. His presence is not created by the right music, the right atmosphere, or even by our awareness of it.
God has chosen a people as his dwelling place.
That means the value of the gathering cannot finally rest on whether we walked away feeling that something happened.
And that brings us back to the mystery. If we cannot reduce church to the experience it gives us, then perhaps some of its deepest goods are the kind we only discover by inhabiting this life faithfully over time.
DISCOVERING WITHIN FAITHFULNESS
That brings us back to my friend.
He did not get married because he had already calculated everything marriage would eventually produce in his life. He married for reasons he could name then. Years later, he had discovered goods he could not have named at the beginning.
That is an important distinction. Faithfulness was not a strategy for getting those goods. Those goods were discoveries made inside faithfulness.
The same distinction matters for church. We do not remain faithful to Jesus and his people because we have calculated that doing so will make us healthier, happier, wiser, or more fulfilled. Faithfulness is our response to what God has made.
But then, over time, something surprising happens. We begin to discover that this faithful life has been doing something to us. People have exposed things in us we would rather not see. They have required patience we did not know we needed. They have given us opportunities to forgive, to receive forgiveness, to make room, to surrender control, to tell the truth, to carry burdens, to be carried ourselves.
None of that is particularly efficient. But it is formative.
Which means there may be a better question hiding underneath Why church? Not simply: What is my faithfulness here doing FOR me? But: What is my faithfulness here doing TO me?
That is not the reason to be faithful. It is the discovery that follows faithfulness.
And that is where this study begins.
If this raised a question or something you’d like to talk through, I’d be glad to continue the conversation. Email Pastor John.
Return to Pulled Together