One of my favorite places to take the kids is Joshua’s Park in Amherst. The equipment is good. The playground is spread out. And, maybe most importantly for a parent, I can usually park myself on a bench and see the kids from almost every direction.
Not everyone knows about it. It sits a little ways back from the road, almost like a hidden gem. The parking area is off to one side, and a long walkway leads toward the playground. On the opposite side of that walk is something that catches my attention almost every time: a long, fenced-in community garden.
When everything is in bloom, it is hard not to look over with curiosity. I don’t know all the mechanics of it. I don’t know how someone gets a plot, or why each person wanted one in the first place. Maybe some live in apartments. Maybe someone’s yard is too shady. Maybe the soil at home is terrible. Maybe they just wanted to grow something alongside other people.
Whatever brought them there, what fascinates me is not simply the variety. It is the work in the garden. Plot after plot has been turned, planted, watered, weeded, staked, and returned to. One bed may be vegetables and another flowers, but they all bear the marks of repeated attention. And because the plots sit side by side, each tended space reinforces the same expectation: this is a place where people keep showing up to cultivate life.
A stray flower beside the path can be beautiful. The garden is different. Its beauty has a rhythm behind it. One plant does not literally teach the next one how to grow, but together the plots make cultivation visible. They tell the same story without words: this ground is worth tending; growth is possible here.
THE RHYTHMS WE RESIST
Those repeated patterns are part of what makes the garden beautiful. But isn’t it true that even beautiful things, repeated often enough, can become boring?
Church is full of repetition too: the same opening, the same songs, the same sermon rhythms, the same Communion words. Familiarity can make meaning harder to hear because our minds learn what is coming and stop paying attention. We call it “going through the motions,” and repetition can preserve the motion long after our attention has drifted from its meaning.
“The church is not here to entertain us” is true, but it can become too easy an answer. Jesus taught truth with seeds, storms, banquets, lost coins, and sons who came home. The Psalms sing truth. The prophets use poetry and image. Paul calls churches to song. Christian truth has never been allergic to beauty, surprise, or attention.
Could repetition, badly handled, become a kind of organizational sin—taking something alive and rehearsing it so carelessly that no one has to notice it anymore?
And if repetition can flatten meaning, why were the early Christians giving themselves to certain patterns?
A PEOPLE DEVOTED
That is part of what makes Acts 2:42–47 so striking. Jesus’ own ministry often looks anything but repetitive. He teaches in towns and villages, along roads and at tables, from hillsides and boats. His images seem to rise out of the world in front of him: seeds, storms, coins, vineyards, banquets. The Gospels give us a Jesus who is remarkably alive to the person and moment in front of him not stale or boring in any sense of the word.
Then Pentecost comes, the Spirit is poured out, and Luke describes the new community with a surprisingly steady word: devoted. “They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer.” Luke does not merely tell us that these believers became a people. He tells us what this people kept returning to.
“Devoted” is stronger than “they had a habit.” It carries persistence and commitment. This is a people giving themselves together to practices because they mattered. There was something in the repetition worth keeping alive because it made them alive.
But if repetition can so easily slip into mindless rhythm, what was it that made the early church’s commitments worth repeating?
RITUAL OVER ROUTINE
Psychologist Barbara Fiese and her colleagues, reviewing 50 years of family research, drew a useful distinction between routines and rituals. A routine mainly communicates, “this is what needs to be done.” A ritual communicates, “this is who we are.” Both repeat, but ritual carries meaning—and can leave an emotional residue after the moment itself is over (Journal of Family Psychology, 2002).
That language can make many of us uneasy. In our circles, “ritual” often sounds like dead religion—and sometimes the criticism is deserved. Ritual can become ceremony for ceremony’s sake: words detached from Scripture, practices continued because they meant something once, gestures buried beneath a history no one remembers. Repetition can preserve the shell after the story has drained out.
But repetition alone is not the point. Repetition that carries identity is different.
Think about a family ritual: the same birthday song, the same prayer before a holiday meal, the same ridiculous phrase everyone knows by heart. The repetition does more than add meaning to a moment. It locates us: these are my people; this is what we remember; this is how we live. Repeated together, practices can give identity a shape we inhabit. But plenty of rituals can do that. Families, teams, nations, even brands use repeated practices to tell people who “we” are. So what makes the identity carried by Christian rhythms distinctly Christian?
A STORY WE INHABIT
That is where the story matters. Christian rhythms are not valuable simply because they are old, beautiful, or repeated. They are anchored to the story the church has received in Scripture—the life, death, resurrection, reign, and promised return of Jesus. We return to these practices because they keep placing that story around us and inviting us to live inside it together.
The Lord’s Supper makes that concrete. We do not merely hear again that Jesus gave himself for us. We hear the words, receive bread and cup, eat and drink, and step again into the drama of a body given and blood poured out. The ritual has meaning because we know the story it is telling—and because it invites us to inhabit that story again.
Brad Edwards calls this an “embodied narrative” in chapter 8 of The Reason for Church. His jazz illustration gets at the idea: master musicians can improvise because they have rehearsed the music so deeply that they no longer have to stop and calculate every note. They do not merely know the music; they have learned to live inside it.
Colossians 3 gives us language Acts does not: “Let the message of Christ dwell among you richly” as believers teach and admonish one another and sing psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs. Acts shows shared practices; Colossians helps us see how repeated words and songs can become a kind of inhabitation. The message does not merely visit. It dwells among them.
Rehearsal is not magic; repeated rhythms do not automatically make us live like Jesus.
But it can give the Jesus story another chance to interrupt our first instinct. A phrase from a song returns. A prayer comes to mind. The Table changes what we think we are entitled to grasp. A brother or sister reminds us we are not alone. The rhythm creates a pause—and in that pause, the story of Jesus gives us another way to see the moment and another way to respond.
Over time, those interruptions can begin to reshape what feels plausible to us. Grace becomes easier to hear above the old voice that says we must earn our worth. Repentance becomes less frightening because we have rehearsed forgiveness. A stranger can begin to look less like an interruption because we have repeatedly been welcomed. Suffering does not become small, but hope becomes more plausible because resurrection has been sung, preached, prayed, and tasted so many times.
This is where rehearsal becomes more than familiarity. A practiced story becomes available when life moves faster than reflection. We are not handed a script for every moment. But when grace, resurrection, prayer, generosity, confession, and welcome have been rehearsed deeply enough, they begin to supply instincts.
A STORY OUR LIVES CAN TELL
What makes that space at Joshua’s Park a garden is not simply that plants happen to be near one another. The whole place is organized around repeated cultivation: soil turned, seeds planted, weeds pulled, water given, plants staked, and people returning.
Church rhythms are a kind of shared cultivation. Teaching, the Table, prayer, fellowship, song—week after week they work the Jesus story into our attention, imagination, memory, and relationships. Not automatically. Not perfectly. But together they keep making the story available to us.
Then Monday comes. A coworker irritates us. A child melts down. A diagnosis lands. Money feels tight. Someone needs mercy we do not feel like giving. The church gathering is over, but the story we practiced together is still with us. Grace can interrupt defensiveness. Prayer can redirect fear. The Table can remind us that we live by receiving. Fellowship can make love for actual people feel less theoretical.
The point of Sunday’s rhythms is not that we become good at Sunday. The story gets into us. We carry it with us.
The garden makes that visible. Repeated tending is not the destination; it cultivates life that continues beyond the moment of tending. In the same way, the rhythms of the church are not meant to end with the gathering. Over time, they cultivate a people who can carry Jesus’ story into the rest of their lives as well.
Sunday gives the Jesus story somewhere to dwell in us so that, on Monday, it can become the story our lives tell.
If this raised a question or something you’d like to talk through, I’d be glad to continue the conversation. Email Pastor John.
Return to Pulled Together